Notes from Intel's session at MassRobotics on open infrastructure for physical AI, and the question it left open: who owns the timing?

Spent the day at MassRobotics for Intel's session, "Open Infrastructure to Scale from Models to Machines." Thank you to Nagesh Puppala and Jason Osborne for presenting, to Colleen Anderson, Director of Community and Events at MassRobotics, for hosting us, and to Trossen Robotics for the hands-on stations.

One slide stayed with me. Intel drew the stack as Sense, Reason, Validate, Act, and put control logic, timing rules, limits, and fallback paths in the Validate box. Its closing line: "AI provides intelligence. Validated control turns that intelligence into dependable physical action."

When AI moves from recommendations to motion, a major chip vendor now lists timing and determinism as infrastructure requirements. That is the question I posted about this morning: who owns the timing?

The most relaxed attendee in the room was the robot on the couch.

Thoughts?

This perspective was originally published on LinkedIn. Join the discussion, add your thoughts, and follow for regular updates.

View on LinkedIn